After months of arguments and return appeals and fortch of the Philadelphia Eagles, the NFL is not prohibiting the ‘push of Tush’. The most controversial football game became the most unstoppable offensive weapon of the Eagles, promoting them to the success of the postseason, and any other team is trying to find ways to emulate or stop it.
The final vote in the game place on Wednesday, with the owners of the NFL not to obtain the 24 votes required to prohibit the work (only obtained 22). This occurred after the NFL competition committee and the players’ security committee voted to prohibit the play, the proposal would have added to Verbia to the rules book that prohibited another player from promoting or launching the ball bearer forward, or helping the subject.
I am an enemy of thrust of Tush, in itself. I’m sad, it’s not dead.
It has nothing to do with being disseminated to defend or have in the eagles. In fact, I think it is incredible that they have found a new and relatively simple technique to optimize the field seafood slide while they put more or a responsibility for the ability of the interior rulers. The main problem I have is that the game is boring. Things can be incredible and boring like hell at the same time, and eliminates much of the goal line drama that makes a tense football game great.
Since the eagles beg use the thrust of Tush, do you know what they have not used? Literally anything else. Do not fade the back of the annotation zone, without bruises, backups of short yards that hit it, no individual athletics of Jalen hurts to jump on the battery or bury on his own. Only a generic and standard thrust behind that more often that does not hit the ball.
Frankly, I do not want to see the 32 teams doing it, and although I hate arguments of slippery slope, in this case it is valid, due to a fundamental imbalance in the rules. Offensive players can push the ball bearer, but defensive players cannot push each other to add more pressure at the point of attack like a rugby scrum. If the defenses wake up Allowed to push and have more arguments to maintain the thrust of the Tosa, but it is correctly a rule imbalance that allows the offensive to pus more strength on the line than the defense.
The offensive is proactive, the defense is reactive. This is the thrust and the pull of football. It is simply too difficult for an individual defensive player to react to the director of the Tush impulse, the level of the play and how it runs when you have a hive mind that pushes it with the force of multiple players.
We have already seen the NFL coaches to ask at the meetings for clarifications about whether they can push a corridor or push a fullback, which means that there are at least circles of the league about how to adapt the foundations of the thrust of Tush Push. We want to see That Be football?
Soccer evolves in flows and flows. Someone Innova, opponents work to counteract it and people pivot. Even if the impulse of Tush was going to be this game child that served as the taste of the league of the months, it is still so inherently boring to see, especially its success rate, as a result of so many enhanceable magical plays.
Do you remember when the chiefs used Dt Dentari Poe as a short yard to take advantage of their dough to move forward? What about JJ Watt becoming a closed wing in goal line plays and capturing short routes? These creative moments evaporate if there is a clear and obvious game “better” to run every time a goal line situation arises.
The thrust of Tush does not amounts to an evolution in the game as the Slam dump, it is the equivalent of lifting a shipowner in the air so that he can hang the edge like a child. Are you needed a minimum or ability to quickly take the click and be unison with your teammates? Sure. Does that make it fun or interesting? No.
Now let’s see more thrust of Tush than ever. Congratulations to the offensive coordinators around the NFL, because their work became much easier. Why be forced to be creative with Playcalling when you can push the quarterback?